SECTIONS


This lesson was created by Rivanna Jihan, a high school teacher in Chicago, IL, as part of the Spring 2025 Pulitzer Center Teacher Fellowship program. It is designed for facilitation across approximately five days.

For more lessons created by Pulitzer Center Teacher Fellows in this cohort, click here.

Speaking to the topic of poverty, generally, it is important to stick with the information of the articles, to interrogate the systemic causes of poverty, and to challenge any thinking on the part of the students that if people just “work harder,” they can overcome the systematic oppressions of poverty as portrayed in these sets of articles. One overarching goal of this mini-unit is to derail the individualist thinking that supports the perpetuation of such systems.

Lesson Overview

This unit is designed to connect students with one another through shared experiences, regardless of geographic distance or area. In facilitating this connection, students will have the opportunity to see how their struggles exist in other regions, including regions that are different from their hometowns. Students will also have the opportunity to hear from and interact with journalists, to discuss how reporting on these issues impacts the ability of residents to get relief, and the ability of the wider world to gain understanding of communities that are often seen only in stereotypes.

In 2020, the Illinois legislature made a bold promise to end poverty by 2036 in the state of Illinois. In this mini-unit, students will explore the impacts of poverty in Illinois following that promise. Students will examine a set of topics from two case studies, one from Chicago and the other from Alexander County, in the southern tip of the state. Each pair of students will be assigned one of the following topics, and will compare information from each location: housing, jobs, childcare, impact of incarceration, local politicians, and food deserts. Following their investigations on the topics, students will then connect online with students from another school — ideally, students in Chicago will connect with students from Southern Illinois, and vice versa, but any differences in geographically different regions (rural vs. urban, wealth vs. poor, etc.) will work. Then, all students will meet with journalists online to discuss the role of journalists and the media in telling accurate stories and sharing underreported news.

Essential Questions

  1. How does connecting with others impact and change our understanding of ourselves and the world?
  2. How are different aspects of society handling the impacts of poverty in Illinois (eg, housing, jobs, food deserts, childcare, impact of incarceration, and local politicians)?
  3. What role does the media play in our understanding of others and ourselves?

Performance Task

Option A (unit with school partnership)

On Day 5, students will return to the Essential Question and the Inquiry Questions they created on Day 1. In a 2-3 paragraph reflection, students will respond to the Essential Question and at least 1 Inquiry Question. 

  • They should cite evidence from at least two documents to support their position
  • They should bring in information from the whole-class discussions with their classmates and the partner school

Option B (unit without school partnership)

  1. Once students have shared from each pair of articles, direct them back to their Inquiry Questions and the Essential Question. 
  2. Spend 5-10 minutes supporting students as they bring their new information to bear on the questions. This can be done as a whole class on a screen or whiteboard, or it can be done in small groups, where each student shares information from their readings to respond to the questions.
  3. Finally, have students answer the essential question and at least one Inquiry Question. In a 2-3 paragraph reflection, students will respond to the questions they chose. 
    1. They should cite evidence from at least 2 documents to support their position
    2. They should include information from the whole-class discussions with their classmates.

Assessment

Option A (unit with school partnership)

Create a rubric with the following criteria:

IL.SS.IS.1/3.9-12: Address essential questions that reflect an enduring issue; develop new supporting questions

  • Day 1, activity 3
  • Day 3, activity 3
  • Day 5 activity

CCSS. RH.9-12.1-2: Determining central ideas and citing specific evidence

  • Day 1, activities 1-2
  • Day 2, activity 1

CCSS.RH.9-12.7: Integrating maps and charts into understanding

  • Day 1, activity 2

CCSS. RH.9-12.6/9: Comparing and contrasting authors and information in more than 1 document

IL.SS.IS.4-5.9-12: Gather and evaluate information; identify evidence from multiple sources

  • Day 1, activities 1-2
  • Day 2, activity 2
  • Day 3, activity 2
  • Day 4, activity 2

CCSS.SL.9-12.1: Initiate and participate in a range of collaborative discussions

  • Day 1, activity 3
  • Day 3, activity 1-2
  • Day 4, activity 3

CCSS.WHST.9-12.1/4: Write arguments focused on content, in a clear and concise fashion

  • Day 5 activity

CCSS.WHST.9-12.8: Gather relevant information from multiple sources, integrate information, and avoid plagiarism

IL.SS.IS.6.9-12: Construct and evaluate explanations and arguments using multiple sources.

  • Day 5 activity

Option B (unit without school partnership)
Create a rubric with the following criteria:

IL.SS.IS.1/3.9-12: Address essential questions that reflect an enduring issue; develop new supporting questions

  • Day 1, activity 3
  • Day 3 activities

CCSS. RH.9-12.1-2: Determining central ideas and citing specific evidence

  • Day 1, activities 1-2
  • Day 2, activity 1

CCSS.RH.9-12.7: Integrating maps and charts into understanding

  • Day 1, activity 2

CCSS. RH.9-12.6/9: Comparing and contrasting authors and information in more than one document

IL.SS.IS.4-5.9-12: Gather and evaluate information; identify evidence from multiple sources

  • Day 1, activities 1-2
  • Day 2, activity 2
  • Day 3, activity 1

CCSS.SL.9-12.1: Initiate and participate in a range of collaborative discussions

  • Day 1, activity 3
  • Day 3, activity 1-2

CCSS.WHST.9-12.1/4: Write arguments focused on content, in a clear and concise fashion

  • Day 3, activity 3

CCSS.WHST.9-12.8: Gather relevant information from multiple sources, integrate information, and avoid plagiarism

IL.SS.IS.6.9-12: Construct and evaluate explanations and arguments using multiple sources.

  • Day 3, activity 3

Notes on Context & Content Advisory

My students attend school on the South Side of Chicago and live on the South and West sides of the city. While they do not all live in poverty, their neighborhoods and our school are categorized by census tract and other demographic indicators as “poor.” Because suburbs surround Chicago, many of which are vastly wealthier than the South and West sides of Chicago, there is often an assumption that outside of Chicago, Illinois is wealthy. This unit is an exploration of the ways poverty traverses Illinois geographically, and an opportunity for students to see how people at the opposite end of the state struggle with many of the same issues that my students’ families and communities face.

Please help us understand your needs better by filling out this brief survey!

Will you use this lesson plan in a class you teach?
By sharing your email address, you are opting in to receive updates from the Pulitzer Center Education team.

RELATED TOPICS

teal halftone illustration of two children, one holding up a teddy bear

Topic

Children and Youth

Children and Youth
teal halftone illustration of a construction worker holding a helmet under their arm

Topic

Labor Rights

Labor Rights
Criminal Justice

Topic

Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice
teal halftone illustration of a raised fist

Topic

Racial Justice

Racial Justice
navy halftone illustration of a halved avocado

Topic

Food Security

Food Security